I really wasn’t planning on making a deal about Limbaugh’s speech at CPAC, but it’s really been making rounds around the newswires. A complete transcript is available here. Video is embedded below (about an hour and a half, cut into 10 parts):
2 comments, join the conversation
Posted under Economy
Written by admin on March 2, 2009
First off, a hat tip to Verbal Thermite, where I first saw this posted. I will preface this by saying I don’t believe the fair tax will solve every issue in the US. I do believe that consumption-based (as opposed to income-based) is a much less complex, less expensive, and (forgive the term) fair system.
14 comments, join the conversation
Posted under Economy
Written by admin on March 1, 2009
ARTICLE SET STICKY UNTIL EVENT:
I am getting a lot of traffic from search engines regarding this event. I want to be sure that anyone that is searching for this can find it easily.
Welcome to all of you that searched for the Cincinnati Tea Party info and came to this site. Stick around, check out the articles, post some comments, and come back! This is one of a small handful of political blogs in our area.
I have been informed that the Cincinnati Tea Party is planned for Sunday, March 15, 3PM – 5PM at Fountain Square. Check out the official website for more details. Former Congressman Steve Chabot will be speaking.
Take the opportunity to be vocal. Being a member of the silent majority is not enough. We need to show our compassion, state our case, and make it clear that we are unhappy with the path the Government is taking.
If you are a reader from outside the area, check out the American Tea Party list and participate in your local tea party.
6 comments, join the conversation
Posted under Economy
Written by admin on February 27, 2009
It seems clear that the Republicans are trying to position Jindal to be the new face for the party. Though many on the left regard him as an Uncle Tom, Jindal clearly has a Conservative philosophy. My issue with him is that he badly needs to work on his delivery. For one, I wish someone would tie Jindal’s hands. He talks with his hands so much that it is distracting! He also needs to learn the art of the “dramatic pause” and use more vocal inflection.
It seems recent Republicans are horrible at speech delivery, especially when you consider that Reagan was an expert. In this day of style over substance (*cough* Obama *cough*), this is going to be a big problem for Republicans. His writers could also provide overwhelming examples of where similar proposals to the ones he mentions have worked in the past. The opportunity is there to charismatically and powerfully deliver the message, we just need someone to do it! Jindal needs to move away from the dry and monotone delivery and writing.
Focusing on content (which given the delivery was difficult to do), I am glad that Jindal admitted that the Republican Party screwed up and moved away from Conservative principles. He has kept a consistent message, now it is up to the Republicans to act according to that message. Reagan Conservatism was both successful and popular, why the Republicans moved away from that philosophy is anyone’s guess. The 2006 and 2008 elections were hopefully a wake up call that Jindal is stepping forward to answer.
If Jindal wants to make a run for President in 2012 (and I hope he does), he MUST work on his speech abilities. A well-delivered speech drives home the points in a memorable way. Honestly, this speech was difficult to concentrate on, let alone remember.
Republican response embedded below:
2 comments, join the conversation
Posted under Economy
Written by admin on February 25, 2009
In a turnaround from the doom and gloom that Obama has spreading since taking office, he switched back to a more “hope” inspired speech. Unfortunately, it appears he is still going to push towards a Government-based solution. As a Conservative, I believe strongly that America is best when its citizens learn self-reliance. Government should strengthen its citizens, not itself.
Obama stated that he has identified $2 Trillion in savings over the next 10 years. Though the ten year forecast seems popular in Government, Obama truly only has control over his own term (4 years, possibly 8). Even so, $2 Trillion isn’t much more than the stimulus and mortgage bailout (well over $1 Trillion) which he’s spent in only his first month in office. Furthermore, Obama’s budget proposal seems to heavily depend upon tax increases on both corporations and business owners that will heavily affect the job market. Some in Congress will have the foresight to see the ill effects to the economy and will fight hard to prevent this mistake from occurring.
I am still concerned that he continues to push that his plans will “save or create 3.5 million jobs” as if it is a fact. His own economists stated: “It should be understood that all of the estimates presented in this memo are subject to significant margins of error…. Our estimates of economic relationships and rules of thumb are derived from historical experience and so will not apply exactly in any given episode. Furthermore, the uncertainty is surely higher than normal now because the current recession is unusual both in its fundamental causes and its severity.” It’s nice to have predictions, but the expectations are set high. Ideas similar to Obama’s that have been tried in the past have come up well short of their predicted values.
Obama’s Address in full is embedded below:
No comments, add your thoughts here
Posted under Economy
Written by admin on February 25, 2009
Loading ...